Orange County Theatre Reviews

Patrick Chavis 

Sherlock Holmes is without a doubt the most famous detective in recognized detective fiction. Sherlock is an archetype of the brilliant but eccentric crime-solver. I say archetype because he’s been copied over as  different book characters to literal adaptions, to shows, and re-imaginings (see House).  In Sherlock Holmes and the Maple Leaf Killer, we find ourselves watching maybe the most Un-Sherlock Sherlock Holmes story imaginable–partly because the man is rarely there. This is actually the story of Sherlock’s protégés (not Watson) Oscar Dove and Busby. Can they solve the crime? Will the brave detectives survive? Or will the dangerously cold Canadian climate be too much for our heroes?

A murder has occurred, this time in the cold climate of Calgary, Canada. The deceased is Max Walcott, and he recently hired Oscar Dove to find out who was trying to kill him.  After the mystery person succeeded Oscar Dove(not to mention a disguised Sherlock dressed like a cowboy) must shift through all of the different suspects and prove he can solve a crime just as well as Sherlock.  

I wasn’t joking in the first paragraph when I was talking about the dangers of the Canadian climate. The actual weather is the most dangerous thing faced here. There is no actual threat in this entire play and it’s a murder mystery. It’s quite shocking. I have grown up reading and idolizing Sherlock’s adventures and this is perhaps the blandest mystery I have ever witnessed.  At the most basic level Sherlock/the detective/the lead character in question must have something to lose. There’s absolutely none of that here. It’s a Scooby  Doo  cartoon  without the chase scene. The chase scene is like half the story in Scooby Doo!

The focus of the show is  less on the mystery and more on the comedy derived from Oscar Dove, who keeps reminding us he is not Sherlock and is terribly worried he will do something wrong. This of course is not an issue either because the audience knows from the beginning that Sherlock is behind the scenes. So there is no real possibility of anything going wrong. Everything is perfect.

This play is plagued by long monologues and too much exposition. It’s pretty accurate to describe the first act as Oscar Dove sitting and writing correspondence letters to Watson and Sherlock Holmes. Is it impossible to make letter writing interesting? No, I think there are creative ways to establish some type of action during these moments. However these ways are neither written in the script nor added by the director of this production. I’ve seen it done, letter writing can be interesting. That really is the job of the director, to look at every moment and ask the question “How can I make this worth watching?”

This show was not devoid of good performances. They are apparent from beginning to end. But the show falls apart mostly because of the two leads Michael Bryant (Oscar Dove) and Gary McCarver (Sherlock/Texas Jack).   McCarver plays his disguised character Texas Jack better then he plays Sherlock. Which is probably why he was cast since the majority of the show Sherlock is in disguise. McCarver does a great job playing a cowboy type character fitting quite naturally into the role when he is around.

Bryant is not unskilled but I feel he either wasn’t ready for this role or wasn’t given enough time to prep. With the amount of dialogue and without any real breaks during most of the show it was pretty obvious that he was having trouble getting through the lines.

Connor Hill was wonderful in the role of Busby and played the part naturally with a good energy that made every scene he was in work a lot better. Clohilda (Felicia Marie Leclair) was solid through out the entire night and played her character in such a way that you never were quite sure if she was guilty or not.  Though not perfect Kathryn Leyes Fischer’s performance holds the show together and provides some substance to a very weak story.

After watching the El Camino Real production of Sherlock Holmes : The Maple Leaf Murder, I was left with more questions about the production and the story than I was about the actual mystery. Obvious talent does exist and the will to put on good show is definitely there, but it does not connect well in their latest showing.

buy

My Review
6.4 Overall
Users 0 (0 votes)
Story5
Acting7
Set & Design7.5
Costumes7
Entertainment5.5
What people say... 0 Leave your rating

Be the first to leave a rating.

Leave your rating

Comments are closed.